Richard Guenther schrieb: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Cristian Rodriguez wrote: > >> Hi folks: >> >> There are several libraries that ships binary utils that are not needed >> for the library to work by itself but the library packaging policy nor >> any other document covers the naming of this packages. >> >> so, how you think the should be called ? >> >> libfooN-util >> >> libfoo-util >> >> libfoo-bin >> >> libfooN-bin >> >> Comments :? > > libfoo-tools - at least that is what has the most existing packages > (the -tools suffix).
True, but interestingly Novell employees don't seem to like those since for 10.3 I know of one being merged to the library package for a non-reason :-( Wolfgang --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
