Michael Matz schrieb: > Hi, > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote: > >>> libfoo-tools - at least that is what has the most existing packages >>> (the -tools suffix). >> True, but interestingly Novell employees don't seem to like those since >> for 10.3 I know of one being merged to the library package for a >> non-reason :-( > > Which one? Because normally that would be against the lib policy (having > binaries in the libbla2.rpm).
mozilla-nss which doesn't conform to the lib policy right now at all but at least there were libraries and tools separated but got merged for reasons I don't understand because it easily could have been done using proper dependencies or patterns. Wolfgang --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
