On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Cristian Rodriguez wrote: > Hi folks: > > There are several libraries that ships binary utils that are not needed > for the library to work by itself but the library packaging policy nor > any other document covers the naming of this packages. > > so, how you think the should be called ? > > libfooN-util > > libfoo-util > > libfoo-bin > > libfooN-bin > > Comments :?
libfoo-tools - at least that is what has the most existing packages (the -tools suffix). Richard. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
