On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Michael Schroeder wrote:- >On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:13:35PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote: >> On 2007-10-25 13:06:59 +0200, Peter Czanik wrote: >> > Well, in this case I would not need to enter a blocker bug for openSUSE >> > 10.3 ppc32 just a few minutes ago ( >> > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336678 ). The problem is, >> > that 64bit packages are installed on a 32bit system, and render it >> > practically useless, especially when it comes to on-line updates... >> >> that is a yast bug and not an RPM bug. > >It's probably not even a bug in yast. I think he has installed the >"64bit" pattern.
I don't have the 64bit pattern installed, since I only have a G3. However, I also have several 64bit packages installed. What's more, I can't remove them without causing a lot of broken dependencies. I've added the details here: <URL:https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336678#c1> Regards, David Bolt -- Team Acorn: http://www.distributed.net/ OGR-P2 @ ~100Mnodes RC5-72 @ ~15Mkeys | SUSE 10.1 32bit | openSUSE 10.2 32bit | openSUSE 10.3 32bit SUSE 10.0 64bit | SUSE 10.1 64bit | openSUSE 10.2 64bit | RISC OS 3.11 | RISC OS 3.6 | TOS 4.02 | openSUSE 10.3 PPC --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
