On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:22:37PM +0100, David Bolt wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Michael Schroeder wrote:- > > >On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:13:35PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > >> On 2007-10-25 13:06:59 +0200, Peter Czanik wrote: > >> > Well, in this case I would not need to enter a blocker bug for openSUSE > >> > 10.3 ppc32 just a few minutes ago ( > >> > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336678 ). The problem is, > >> > that 64bit packages are installed on a 32bit system, and render it > >> > practically useless, especially when it comes to on-line updates... > >> > >> that is a yast bug and not an RPM bug. > > > >It's probably not even a bug in yast. I think he has installed the > >"64bit" pattern. > > I don't have the 64bit pattern installed, since I only have a G3. > However, I also have several 64bit packages installed. What's more, I > can't remove them without causing a lot of broken dependencies. I've > added the details here: > > <URL:https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336678#c1>
This is due to some PAM requirements conceptional misunderstandings. We have to have both 32bit and 64bit PAM modules usually and this bled into requirements of some packages. Ciao,M --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
