Hello, Marcus Meissner wrote: > This is due to some PAM requirements conceptional misunderstandings. > > We have to have both 32bit and 64bit PAM modules usually and this bled > into requirements of some packages. > Could you provide an online update for ppc32, which kicks off these 64bit requirements? Right now the situation is, that 100+ 64bit packages are about to be installed on update, but it fails, as pre/post install scripts obviously don not work, as 64bit software does not execute at all on 32bit... Bye, CzP --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Pascal Bleser
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Peter Czanik
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Marcus Rueckert
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Lukas Ocilka
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Michael Schroeder
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Peter Czanik
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org David Bolt
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Peter Czanik
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org David Bolt
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Marcus Meissner
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Peter Czanik
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Marcus Meissner
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Thorsten Kukuk
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Michael Schroeder
- Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpm5.org Michael Schroeder
