John Andersen wrote: > On Friday 10 November 2006 18:40, J Sloan wrote: >> I would think it's quite obvious - it's a double standard. Either it's OK >> to be involved with microsoft, or it's not. You can't have it both ways. > > Sure he can. Who appointed you king?
No, he can't - it's a logical contradiction. Prefixing a nonsensical proposition with "he can" doesn't make it any more true or valid. And to answer your question, what does pointing out the obvious have to do with being a king? > One can be involved in microsoft in the paid software world and > be disinclined to be involved with microsoft in the free software world. Rationalizing by means of an artificial distinction? Joe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
