John Andersen wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
>
>> Robert Lewis wrote:
>>
>
>
>> Since the 2 are aimed at different use scenarios, maybe you are making
>> this harder than NOW is necessary. The developers do realize there are
>> problems. That is why they created opensuseupdater. Try it, you'll
>> like it. It is much more lightweight than zen-updater, only trying to
>> notify the user of security updates. Zen-updater is designed to notify
>> of an update in every configured repository. Which do you think would
>> need more resources? Add to that load the fact that it isn't just a
>> matter of seeing something newer, but making sure it isn't a rogue
>> package by verifying the gpg signature. That is why IMHO zen-updater is
>> doomed by design. I would suggest trying the product you mention in
>> your subject.
>>
>
> Before you dump all over Robert, bear in mind that the software
> that sits in the tray does not report its name, other than to say its
> the software updater. Is that the zen updater or the opensuse updater?
>
> And where does one get the opensuseupdator? Its not listed in
> my menuing system.
>
>
Thanks John, you said exactly what was on my mind.
I recommend SUSE to all my friends and help them with
their computers so I am just looking for encouragement
that the base factory distribution in the future will be
as robust or better than before. I would like to hear
a response to your question as well.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
