On Friday 08 June 2007 00:25, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Thursday 07 June 2007 15:11, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 13:07 -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > > On Thursday 07 June 2007 12:47, John Andersen wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 07 June 2007, Rikard Johnels wrote:
> > > > > Never had any problems with XFS.
> > > > > As people have stated; it cashes alot,
> > > > >
> > > > > XFS is fast, reliable and scales well,
> > > >
> > > > How the heck can you put those two statements
> > > > in the same email???
> > >
> > > I think in the first paragraph, second sentence, he meant "caches,"
> > > not a typo of "crashes."
> >
> > No... He meant caches instead of cashes (as in cash a check)
> > Re-check the spelling, I had to look three times.
>
> That's what I said.
>
> Clearly "cashes" makes no sense, so the two plausible hypotheses
> are "caches" and "crashes." "Crashes" makes the statements
> inconsistent, as it would combine "never had any problems"
> with "crashes a lot."
>
> So we conclude, "cashes" is a typo for "caches."
>
> > --
> > Ken Schneider
>
> RRS

Yes. I was referring to "caches."
English is not my native language. (Swedish is)
And its WAY above my "thinking straight level" temperature limit...

So i am sorry if i confused anyone with my typo...
 


-- 
         /Rikard

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
email   : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web     : http://www.rikjoh.com
mob:    : +46 (0)763 19 76 25
------------------------ Public PGP fingerprint ----------------------------
< 15 28 DF 78 67 98 B2 16 1F D3 FD C5 59 D4 B6 78  46 1C EE 56 >

Attachment: pgpksYgdxnxYB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to