-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The Saturday 2007-06-09 at 08:00 -0400, Bob Kline wrote:

> Well, I'm heeding as well as I know how.  In this case, his advice was a
> single sentence:
> 
> > If you let it get autodetected and configured by YAST, then it the
> > permissions should be set up correctly.
> 
> So I replied explaining that I thought that's what I had done, and I went on
> to describe exactly what I was doing, hoping someone would spot and point out
> to me whatever boneheaded mistake I had made.  Here's my reply:

You should simply reply always to the list, which he scans (pun intended 
;-) )


>    Well, I thought I had done that (as indicated above), but perhaps
>    what I did and "let it get autodetected and configured by YAST"
>    aren't exactly the same things.  I log into the machine as root, run
>    yast2, click on Hardware, then Scanners, and I see it run through an
>    unattended checklist ending with "Detecting USB and SCSI scanners"
>    after which it shows a line with "plustek Canon N1240U/LiDE30 at
>    plustek:libusb:007:002".  If I click on Other ... 

Isn't that your scanner?

> Restart Detection
>    I end up with the same display.  

Then your scanner is reporting itself that way. You can check with 
"usbview".

> If I click Other ... Test I hear
>    the hardware make some noises and a bunch of tests are listed and
>    all marked as OK.  If I then log

I assume you accepted yast proposal. :-?

>  into the machine as a normal user
>    and run xsane I end up with the "No devices available" message.  Am
>    I missing a step in YAST?
> 
> 
> Can anyone tell me where the gap is between what I am doing in YaST and what
> Mr. Meissner is advising me to do?  Is there some other package on which all
> of this relies that everyone's assuming I have (but don't)?  For example,
> earlier in the thread I pointed out the discrepancy between a FAQ document
> some other poster had directed me to and my configuration: I noted that the
> FAQ says that SANE "... comes with a hotplug script and related documentation
> ..." but I can't find any such script or documentation in any of the three
> packages installed on the machine which have "sane" in the package name.

Linux is a moving target, and things change, sometimes a lot. If that 
script does not exist, it means that things are done diferently, by SuSE, 
or nowdays.

- -- 
Cheers,
       Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFGaprAtTMYHG2NR9URAg93AJ9QpQ/Y7J0QxyGRR0DxIWQ09wV0xACfZkDI
nIboPKB/CWMqTgQAgtSUa4k=
=qOoE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to