On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Druid wrote:-
>On 9/9/07, Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just wondering... why is it that the Gnome version of YAST is so
>> dramatically different from the KDE one in openSUSE 10.3 Beta3?
>>
>
>My oppinion, based on historic observations, says that the reason for
>that is simply because they like to change the stuff, just for the
>sake of saying they changed, without absolutely any reason (may the
>flames begin, I know).
You want matches or a lighter to start them off? :)
<snip>
>> The Gnome version of YAST is unwieldy and hard to use
>
>100% agreed
I don't completely agree. I actually like the package management part of
the YaST under Gnome. As for the rest of it, I've not dug too deeply
but, from my initial impression, I still don't like it. Mind you, I'm
probably a little biased since I just don't like the look of the Gnome
desktop anyway.
>> - not that the
>> KDE one is a good example,
>
>100% agreed
I quite like the look of the QT version of YaST. It certainly a much
closer match to the console version, which is something I find myself
using more than the GUI version.
>>but it is certainly much much better than
>> the Gnome one.
>
>100% agreed
Well, apart from the package management, I agree with that.
>> Isn't it a bit of a major usability issue if the core tools that set
>> SUSE apart from all the other distributions are so
>> inconsistent/different?
>>
>
>Yes, but as Ive said the gnome people want to make it different at all costs.
Bit more tinder :)
<snip>
>All that said, does it really matter? Everybody uses kde with qt
>interface in yast in opensuse.
Not quite. I actually prefer the console version. It seems a little
quicker and, with the exception of a few features available to the GUI
version[0], is virtually the same.
>Since you expressed your feelings about it, my advice is dont use the
>yast gtk version for the sw_single module and dont use gnome. That way
>you will never see it again, only the qt version, which I think will
>solve your problems, mostly.
That's certainly one way round it.
Regards,
David Bolt
--
Member of Team Acorn checking nodes at 100 Mnodes/s: www.distributed.net
RISC OS 3.11 | SUSE 10.0 32bit | SUSE 10.1 32bit | openSUSE 10.2 32bit
RISC OS 3.6 | SUSE 10.0 64bit | SUSE 10.1 64bit | openSUSE 10.2 64bit
TOS 4.02 | SUSE 9.3 32bit | | openSUSE 10.3b2 32bit
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]