On Sunday 09 September 2007 15:52:00 Clayton wrote: > > I quite like the look of the QT version of YaST. It certainly a much > > closer match to the console version, which is something I find myself > > using more than the GUI version. > > Therein stands my point. The CLI version and the QT version are close > enough in layout and style to be effectively the same. Walking > through one or the other, you are in familiar territory. Then you > fire up Gnome expecting consistent tools... and you're faced with that > dogs breakfast mess of YAST. There is ZERO consistency. That is > plain dumb. Consistency is critical in the interfaces that make SUSE > stand out.
Isn't it more important to have internal consistency in the desktop you're using? I think the gnome frontend to yast is quite similar to the gnome control center, which means gnome users should feel at home in it No, I don't particularly care for the gnome look-and-feel either, but I do appreciate consistency. I don't want applications in my kde desktop with reversed cancel/ok buttons, even if they were originally written for gnome -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
