On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 18:21 +0100, Stefan Hundhammer wrote: > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 17:21, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > > > See my earlier comment. > > > This doesn't sort packages as wanted. > > > I found package with newer version in the middle of the list of packages > > > that have no newer version. > > > > You are not sorting properly. > > You are not reading properly. ;-)
I am reading what you are writing. Perhaps you are not writing what you are meaning :) When I sort as I said, there are NOT packages that have no newer versions listed intermixed with those that do have newer versions. > > If you click on the left most column header, it does indeed sort all the > > packages that can be updated to be together. > > No. It sorts by package status. Exactly. If you select to "update packages if new versions are available" (as I described), the status of the package may be set that it can be updated (a little green/black swirl ICON is also shown). When sorting based on status (left-most column), all these will be listed together. It is a feature that I really like for just the reason that I can easily find all packages that could potentially be updated, all listed together. No need to hunt for them. I first saw this method described in a SUSE note on the NOVELL web site. > I should know. I programmed that stuff. ;-) Point taken. -- Roger Oberholtzer OPQ Systems / Ramböll RST Ramböll Sverige AB Kapellgränd 7 P.O. Box 4205 SE-102 65 Stockholm, Sweden Office: Int +46 8-615 60 20 Mobile: Int +46 70-815 1696 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
