Carl Hartung wrote: > On Mon January 28 2008 07:03:36 pm Fred A. Miller wrote: >> So have I, and global warming is BAD science.....PERIOD!! > > I've read your posts for a long time, Fred. Generally speaking, you almost > always have an axe to grind in these kinds of exchanges (purposely avoiding > the word "debate" here because I've read only assertions and insults... the > opponents have no *science*]
You become slick tonged Carl when others don't agree with you. You only read what pleases you, I guess. > And PLEASE reply to the list! :-) You can start here, Carl. Now, I know you won't like what you read and will immediately state that ALL of the references here are from people who don't know what they're talking about, aren't qualified, or whatever. However, it may be educational for those who are interested in the truth instead of holding onto a political agenda. Now, this is off-topic and I'm done with it here. Fred http://www.environmentaldefense.org/page.cfm?tagid=1344 http://csicop.org/doubtandabout/crichton/ http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/news/wales-news/tm_headline=debunking-of-global-warming--bad-science-&method=full&objectid=18749397&siteid=50082-name_page.html http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/ http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58767 http://www.climateofdenial.net/?q=node/3 http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/02/bad_research_horrendous_report.html -- Steve Ballmer is no more able for the art of persuasion than the Abrams tank is for delivering meals on wheels. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
