Ok, what do we want to see for docs? Should we go back into the stuff
from 1.x and re-do that, or just document the new / different stuff for
now?
Here's a quick outline:
Xwork
1)Introduction
a) What is Xwork
Xwork is a generic command pattern framework...
b) How does Xwork relate to Webwork?
Webwork 2.0 is built on top of Xwork...
2) The basics
a) Actions
Actions are the basic unit of execution...
1) The Action Interface
2) ActionSupport
3) Lifecycle
b) No FormBeans?
Xwork / Webwork does not require the use of FormBeans
like Struts...
3) Configuration - Xwork.xml
4) Ognl
Ognl is used as both the expresion language and bean population
utility for Xwork...
5) Interceptors
a) Utility Interceptors
The TimerInterceptor and LoggingInterceptor ...
b) Parameter Interceptors - populating your Action
The StaticParameterInterceptor and ParameterInterceptor
populate your Action fields...
c) ResultInterceptor
6) Validation Framework (optional)
a) The ValidationInterceptor
b) Defining validation rules in a validation.xml
c) Building a FieldValidator
d) Localized and Parameterized messages
I'll take 3, 5, and 6. Patrick, you take (at least) 4, and Joe, since
you brought it up, you get 1 and 2 :-)
What else do we need in there?
Jason
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
>
>
> Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We
> should get cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can
> work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane?
>
> -Pat
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
>
>
> > I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would
> be good if
> > someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint).
> >
> > Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 /
> > WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This
> > isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably
> > leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central
> time) and I
> > asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most
> > pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight.
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM
> > > To: OS-Webwork
> > > Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
> > >
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM
> > > product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the
> > > features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork
> and are not
> > > entirely happy with the current version ).
> > >
> > > So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it
> > > would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at
> > > releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to
> > > live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but
> would like
> > > to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it
> > > will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta
> > > release date, etc ).
> > >
> > > Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and
> > > sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her
> experience
> > > with us ?
> > >
> > > thanks.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Low
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
> > http://shopping.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from
> Thawte are you
> > planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
> Thawte SSL
> > guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
> > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from
> Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here
> to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all
> your SSL security issues.
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-> bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
