I started building one. The consensus at the design meeting last week was that creating a dependency on another validation framework was a Bad Thing, so, since it only took a few hours to put in localized and parameterized messages, we're sticking with our own.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 > > > i havent kept up with all the emails but will you guys be > building your own validator? or will an existing one be used? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:01 PM > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 > > > Ok, what do we want to see for docs? Should we go back into > the stuff from 1.x and re-do that, or just document the new / > different stuff for now? > > > Here's a quick outline: > > Xwork > 1)Introduction > a) What is Xwork > Xwork is a generic command pattern framework... > b) How does Xwork relate to Webwork? > Webwork 2.0 is built on top of Xwork... > 2) The basics > a) Actions > Actions are the basic unit of execution... > 1) The Action Interface > 2) ActionSupport > 3) Lifecycle > b) No FormBeans? > Xwork / Webwork does not require the use of FormBeans > like Struts... > 3) Configuration - Xwork.xml > > 4) Ognl > Ognl is used as both the expresion language and bean > population utility for Xwork... > > 5) Interceptors > a) Utility Interceptors > The TimerInterceptor and LoggingInterceptor ... > b) Parameter Interceptors - populating your Action > The StaticParameterInterceptor and ParameterInterceptor > populate your Action fields... > c) ResultInterceptor > > 6) Validation Framework (optional) > a) The ValidationInterceptor > b) Defining validation rules in a validation.xml > c) Building a FieldValidator > d) Localized and Parameterized messages > > > I'll take 3, 5, and 6. Patrick, you take (at least) 4, and > Joe, since you brought it up, you get 1 and 2 :-) > > What else do we need in there? > > Jason > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:18 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 > > > > > > Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We > should get > > cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can work on a > skeleton > > documentation effort while you're on the plane? > > > > -Pat > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM > > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 > > > > > > > I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would > > be good if > > > someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). > > > > > > Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha > of XW1.0 / > > > WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to > WW2? This > > > isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably > > > leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central > > time) and I > > > asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most > > > pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM > > > > To: OS-Webwork > > > > Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM > > > > product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the > > > > features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork > > and are not > > > > entirely happy with the current version ). > > > > > > > > So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and > whether it > > > > would be inline with our development schedule ( We are > looking at > > > > releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do > not mind to > > > > live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but > > would like > > > > to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For > e.g, when it > > > > will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta > > > > release date, etc ). > > > > > > > > Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and > > > > sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her > > experience > > > > with us ? > > > > > > > > thanks. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Low > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > > Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day > > > http://shopping.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from > > Thawte are you > > > planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE > > Thawte SSL > > > guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. > > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from > Thawte are you > > planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE > Thawte SSL > > guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-> bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from > Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here > to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all > your SSL security issues. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-> bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en > > > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from > Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here > to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all > your SSL security issues. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-> bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en > > > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
