On Thursday 26 July 2007 00:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > In any case, they do not have proper GPL (or any other license) headers
> > (nor do many other NASL plugins, BTW).
>
> Once we clear up the legal status of these plugins we should ensure that
> they all have proper license headers.
Indeed.
> If possible we can even resubmit
> incorrect ones back to the Nessus GPL feed with correct licenses.
I'd prefer to get things done for OpenVAS first.
> Is it
> possible for Renaud (et al) to clarify the status of the plugins listed
> earlier for us?
IIUC, all is clearified through the releases that have been done
in the past. We only need to check back when in doubt.
Best
Jan
--
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner Intevation GmbH
Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HR B 18998 http://www.intevation.de/
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
