Renaud Deraison wrote: > On Jul 26, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote: > > >> Anyone has pointers for any email, archived web page, or otherwise, >> that made it clear that scripts released, for example, in the 2.1.0 >> timeframe, or scripts that were updated via the GPL-feed update >> mechanism, >> were not under the GPL? > > You and I already discussed this over the phone several months ago > and you were very aware of the situation since that's why you could > not distribute the Tenable plugins in the BOSS CD you made. > > It's not like anything is new here : > > http://mail.nessus.org/pipermail/nessus/2004-December/010655.html
Any announcement earlier than this? By the time this announcement went out, wasn't the cat supposedly out of the bag already? I.e. in 2004-July timeframe (Nessus 2.1.0) hundreds of plugins were already released by Tenable, with Tenable copyright, in a fully GPLed distribution. And these scripts continued to be updated via nessus-update-plugins, taking the total to well over 1700 scripts, released with a Tenable copyright, under the GPL, before this announcement ever came out. Unless of course I missed an earlier announcement changing the policy of components of Nessus (i.e the plugins) moving from GPL to a non- GPL license? Thomas _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
