For reference, I compiled nmap 6.01 from source, installed it under
/usr/local (not as a package, as Ubuntu 12.04 uses nmap 5.51), and
openvas works fine. check-openvas-setup does complain about the
version mismatch.

Alan


On 8/8/12, Whit Blauvelt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:08:50PM -0700, Mark LaCore wrote:
>> I like to use nmap SVN, but I found OpenVAS 5 likes nmap 5.50. Run
>> openvas-check-setup and it might tell you about that. You will probably
>> have to
>> find the source tarball and compile it because your package manager
>> probably
>> doesn't have it.
>
> Should nmap 6.01 be good? That's what Ubuntu 12.04's at. If 5.50 is good,
> and SVN is good, barring a regression in between....
>
>> Another thing I found with nmap, is that the default scan timeout is too
>> short
>> if you're scanning a full range of ports on a remote host. Make a new
>> scan
>> policy and adjust the default timeout to something like 2 hours if that
>> makes
>> sense. Also, make sure nmap is enabled as a Port Scanner in your policy.
>> It
>> might not be on as default, I don't remember.
>
> There are so many nmap-related options in the policy I'll need to squint
> farther at them. I've been assuming, since OpenVAS basically doesn't do
> much
> without it, that the default is to use it. Maybe not.
>
>> To troubleshoot further, open a couple terminal windows, and tail -f
>> /var/log/
>> openvas/*.messages and /var/log/openvas/*.dump. Run a scan and maybe
>> something
>> helpful will show up.
>
> I've looked in the logs, as well as at the processes spawned. Nothing
> obviously wrong except for the lack of any nmap invocation. My uncertainty
> is whether OpenVAS actively looks for nmap, doesn't find it (despite it
> being on the system), and so silently runs without it - whether the
> problem's on that level - or whether the "Full and fast" default scan
> considers "Full" to not even require nmap's services - even if nothing much
> is accomplished without them - in which case it's a configuration problem.
>
> If it's a configuration problem, the various installation guides could be
> much improved with an instruction for fixing that, IMHO. I appreciate
> complexly configurable stuff, but the instrument needs to be reasonably
> well
> tuned at first before a person can learn to play it.
>
> Thanks again,
> Whit
> _______________________________________________
> Openvas-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to