Right, 5.21 is definitely correct. Sorry, long day at the office.
On 8/8/12, Whit Blauvelt <[email protected]> wrote: > Oops. To correct my earlier report, the Ubuntu 12.04 system in my latest > experiment is at nmap 5.21, which I assume you typo'd as 5.51, Alan. > > My report below of 6.01 was from looking at a _different_ 12.04 system, > where I'd forgotten I'd installed that from source. For reasons since > forgotten. > > Okay, time to really put 6.01 on the trial system ... > > Whit > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:34:13PM -0400, Alan Tu wrote: >> For reference, I compiled nmap 6.01 from source, installed it under >> /usr/local (not as a package, as Ubuntu 12.04 uses nmap 5.51), and >> openvas works fine. check-openvas-setup does complain about the >> version mismatch. >> >> Alan >> >> >> On 8/8/12, Whit Blauvelt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:08:50PM -0700, Mark LaCore wrote: >> >> I like to use nmap SVN, but I found OpenVAS 5 likes nmap 5.50. Run >> >> openvas-check-setup and it might tell you about that. You will >> >> probably >> >> have to >> >> find the source tarball and compile it because your package manager >> >> probably >> >> doesn't have it. >> > >> > Should nmap 6.01 be good? That's what Ubuntu 12.04's at. If 5.50 is >> > good, >> > and SVN is good, barring a regression in between.... > _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
