Am 19.06.2014 18:35, schrieb Brandon Perry: > Do you believe you are entitled to any of that?
i do not believe - i am sure for two reasons * it is a technical fact * i am free to express my opinion in the world i live and BTW - you do not need to use "reply-all" on a mailing list > The guys heading the atomic repo are awesome. > > This is an open source project, you are entitled to nothing. The fact that > atomic corp maintains packages for such > an excellent open source project just shows how nice the guys at atomicorp > are. It is up to you as much as it is up > to me and every other consumer of their packages to help them do their job. > That means being constructive. You are > not being constructive. they *did* an awesome job and even that is not true otherwise "openvas-scanner" would have dependecies that would not allow uninstall openvas-libraries-6 in a transaction which don't upgrade "openvas-scanner" too - that's why RPM/YUM exists and not notice such major bugs is *not* awesome > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Am 19.06.2014 18:06, schrieb Michael Meyer: > > *** Reindl Harald wrote: > >> Am 19.06.2014 14:15, schrieb Jan-Oliver Wagner: > >>> On Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > >>>> these idiots > >>> > >>> I prefer to maintain a productive, positive community. > >>> If anyone can contribute code, insights, or other things, it > >>> is appreciated. Even if one does not agree or it is not the solution > >>> needed. > >>> If someone made a mistake or lacks time to continue something or > simply asks > >>> a FAQ, it is never appropriate to use such language > >> > >> uhm in case of push packages to a repo and not test at least if > >> the services are starting (i don't talk about working as expected) > >> or just crashing because missing libraries and not build packages > >> sane that dependencies would not allow such a broken upgrade > >> *it is* appropriate > > > > It seems you don't understand it. It's not (always) about what you are > > saying, it's about *how* you say it. It is unacceptable to insult people > > like you are doing here on this list. And it's not the first time... > > > > Have you contacted anyone at atomic to report this problem? > > have you a contact? > i don't > > many months ago i posted on their forums that a package creates a > hidden folder below /usr/bin/ which leads to rkhunter-messages > after every openvas scan until you manually remove that folder > > well, after some months i just uninstalled rkhunter on the > OpenVAS VM to get rid of the mails every day - if you have > a contact which is taken seriously -> go ahead > > however, that don't matter, you get the first fatal errors > *due the 'yum upgrade'* because the rpm-scripts try to restart > the services and spit out the missing libraries - anybody who > needs someone to report such basic problems did not try to > install his own pakcage a single time and is hence an idiot > by definition
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
