Hi, On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:01:33PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > > We've had questions on #openvpn-devel about pull request 7, which was the > > first time (on request *7*) that anyone was taking note that we offer > > pull requests at all - so there's 7 pull requests out there that are > > ignored. > Well, we don't have the manpower to look at Trac bug reporting, and we > still don't disable bug reporting, do we? :)
This is a problem, indeed. But it's not an argument for adding yet another
queue that we don't look at.
> Anyways, I can keep an eye on the pull requests and if something
> interesting pops up, I can forward those people to openvpn-devel. Or, if
> we really want to disable pull requests, we should monitor the OpenVPN
> forks in GitHub for something interesting, and encourage people to push
> their stuff to main development line.
I've never understood the hype around github, tbh. If you see value in
adding to your workload, feel free to - but really, evidence speaks against
enabling pull requests.
Also, Dazo and I won't actually *use* git-pull to fetch those, so one
of the big reasons why you would want that ("to enable git pull") wouldn't
apply anyway. We have agreed on a workflow how to integrate patches, and
"pull" is not part of it. "git am" and "git push" are...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpWDyTuTmvIu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
