-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19/08/13 23:01, Gert Doering wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:21:03PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote: >> I think we should keep the pull requests enabled. Even if we >> don't merge the changes directly, they are a fairly lightweight >> way to contribute. If somebody sends a useful pull request (like >> here) we can always as him/her to send a patch to the mailing >> list. I think that's better than discouraging potential >> contributors with seemingly heavy bureaucracy. > > Is "offering potential contributors something that looks good but > will be fully ignored" encouraging? I doubt it. [...snip...] > The official way to get patches reviewed is "send to openvpn-devel > list", and we shouldn't add alternatives - we already do not have > enough manpower to make sure patches on the list are handled in > time, so let's not fragment where we have to look at.
+1 - -- kind regards, David Sommerseth -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlITPBMACgkQDC186MBRfrqy1gCfdq8Bz4kTrMHrBtxo3MaBg4L6 /iAAn3XI9b0OB4pNnHftxIjtmP6CJTNw =ieJR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
