Hi, On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:25:26PM +0500, ???????? ?????????????? wrote: > the point is "if there were PR ... and some friendly developers behaviour", > so that issue wouldn't get lost "in mailing list archives" > > currently, it was definitely lost. nobody knows where it is
Of course I know where it is https://sourceforge.net/p/openvpn/mailman/message/31717505/ (unfortunately, the search engine of gmane.org is down right now, otherwise their threaded view is much nicer) In that thread, you can also see that you got a NAK on that patch - and that's no different from sending a patch via PR that gets NAKed. As a side note - we do trace open bug reports in our trac, and patches can be attached to that. It won't help if a patch is not accepted, but if you think you need github PR to avoid "things getting lost", put them in trac. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
