On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 19:53 +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > > I released the new Windows installer but without this patch. That said, > the patch/PR you linked to makes sense. Does the patch have an active > maintainer?
That would be me, I suppose. Until/unless the upstream maintainer applies the patch, I or someone else will continue to maintain the patch in the Fedora package at least. > If yes, then I propose is that we > > - Fork OpenSC/pkcs11-helper to OpenVPN/pkcs11-helper > - Apply the patch to our fork > - Produce and publish our own pkcs11-helper tarballs > - Point openvpn-build to our tarballs > - Periodically rebase our fork with upstream > > Thoughts? Well, there's always the option of ditching pkcs11-helper entirely... :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
