Hi, On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 12:44:02PM -0500, selva.n...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Selva Nair <selva.n...@gmail.com> > > Openssl docs do not explicitly state these to be macros although they > are currently defined as such. Use AC_CHECK_DECLS to test for these so that > both function and macro forms could be detected. > > Signed-off-by: Selva Nair <selva.n...@gmail.com> > --- > Though not meant as a fixup for libressl, as a side effect > this also makes 2.4.5 build with newer libressl versions. > (built on freebsd 11 using libressl 2.6.4 while testing patch 238) > Notes: (i) libressl defines only the set functions and neither > are macros. So get functions will get used from the compat layer.
So, going through open patches in patchwork I came to this one.
Reading through the thread, I'm not sure what the final outcome on
the patch and the problem was? LibreSSL seems to be fixed (thanks,
Jeremie :-) ) and if we build with OpenSSL 1.1.0g+, all is good?
Phrased differently: does anything need to be done with this patch or
should I click on "superceded" in patchwork now?
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
