On 29/11/2019 12:37, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:25:13PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: >> On 29/11/2019 11:52, Gert Doering wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:47:02AM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: >>>> With GCC-4.3.8, I see this warning: >>> >>> This is about as old as you :-) - do we care about suppressing warnings >>> in old gcc versions that might suppress a *relevant* warning when >>> compiling with a current gcc version? >> >> This is the default compiler on stock RHEL-7 ... which goes EOL August 2024. > > We're not going to break it. > > I'm just not going to care very much about the warnings it might throw > (and I might object to any patches that are "just for the benefit of > suppressing warnings from gcc-4").
Fair enough. But that will actually restrain us from adding -Werror by default for some time forward, unless we want to make package maintenance a bit more tricky - needing to revert a -Werror chage or add -Wno-missing-braces. If we have status quo for the moment, I can live with that until RHEL-7 is EOL. -- kind regards, David Sommerseth OpenVPN Inc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
