Hi, On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:22:26PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > > I'm just not going to care very much about the warnings it might throw > > (and I might object to any patches that are "just for the benefit of > > suppressing warnings from gcc-4"). > > Fair enough. But that will actually restrain us from adding -Werror by > default for some time forward, unless we want to make package maintenance a > bit more tricky - needing to revert a -Werror chage or add > -Wno-missing-braces. If we have status quo for the moment, I can live with > that until RHEL-7 is EOL.
I don't think we can add -Werror as "on by default" for any platform
in the foreseeable future - we'll always hit "old" or "too new" compilers
that cause build breakage and lots of extra effort to work around it.
Now, well-defined environments ("travis, clang-9, Linux") I'm all for it :)
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
