Hi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, <debbie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gert Doering" <g...@greenie.muc.de> > To: "Selva Nair" <selva.n...@gmail.com> > > > > >> Why? Because of this line in the config: > >> > >> persist-remote-ip > > >> That will keep trying X:1194 only with whatever protocol is defined > >> before > >> those lines (or udp by default), if persist-remote-ip is also specified. > >> This is an unfortunate side-effect of that option. > > > Ouch. > > > Could you re-test whether this is still true with git master, please? > > I think we may have a problem Houston: If I'm not mistaken, persist-remote-ip pre-dates connection-list support. With multiple options conditionally depending on each other, such seemingly unexpected behaviour is no surprise.. Call it feature or a bug. The user asked for persist-remote-ip which the manual says will persist both IP and port, so why expect something else. Instead of adding another conditional in the code may I request the developers to just retire persist-remote-ip or at least ban it when multiple remotes are specified. Selva
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
