----- Original Message ----- From: "Selva Nair" <selva.n...@gmail.com> To: "Debbie Tent" <debbie...@gmail.com> Cc: <openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:23 PM Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] client config fallback from 1194 udp to 80 tcp
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:11 PM, <debbie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> >>>> >> Why? Because of this line in the config: >>>> >> >>>> >> persist-remote-ip >>>> >>>> >> That will keep trying X:1194 only with whatever protocol is defined >>>> >> before >>>> >> those lines (or udp by default), if persist-remote-ip is also >> >>>> specified. >>>> >> This is an unfortunate side-effect of that option. >>>> >>>> > Ouch. >>>> >>>> > Could you re-test whether this is still true with git master, please? >>>> >>>> I think we may have a problem Houston: >>>> >>> >>> >>> If I'm not mistaken, persist-remote-ip pre-dates connection-list >>> support. >>> With multiple options conditionally depending on each other, such >>> seemingly >>> unexpected behaviour is no surprise.. Call it feature or a bug. The user >>> asked for persist-remote-ip which the manual says will persist both IP >>> and >>> port, so why expect something else. >>> >>> >> >> Gert asked for a specific test, which I tested. >> I had no *expectations* > > > Easy, that was meant as legalistic remark for an arbitrary user of the > universe.. Nothing personal. In fact if it applies to anyone it should be > the OP who's problem we all were trying to solve.. > > And, happy to see your test results agrees with mine.. > Results you could have SHARED in the FIRST place .. Happy to see my comments on the OpenVPN "Community" are *not* unfounded. /me is Bowing out of this subject -- bored of time wasters regards ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users