----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Selva Nair" <selva.n...@gmail.com>
To: "Debbie Tent" <debbie...@gmail.com>
Cc: <openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] client config fallback from 1194 udp to 80 tcp


> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:11 PM, <debbie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>>> >> Why? Because of this line in the config:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> persist-remote-ip
>>>>
>>>> >> That will keep trying X:1194 only with whatever protocol is defined
>>>> >> before
>>>> >> those lines (or udp by default), if persist-remote-ip is also >>
>>>> specified.
>>>> >> This is an unfortunate side-effect of that option.
>>>>
>>>> > Ouch.
>>>>
>>>> > Could you re-test whether this is still true with git master, please?
>>>>
>>>> I think we may have a problem Houston:
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken, persist-remote-ip pre-dates connection-list 
>>> support.
>>> With multiple options conditionally depending on each other, such
>>> seemingly
>>> unexpected behaviour is no surprise.. Call it feature or a bug. The user
>>> asked for persist-remote-ip which the manual says will persist both IP 
>>> and
>>> port, so why expect something else.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Gert asked for a specific test, which I tested.
>> I had no *expectations*
>
>
> Easy, that was meant as legalistic remark for an arbitrary user of the
> universe.. Nothing personal. In fact if it applies to anyone it should be
> the OP who's problem we all were trying to solve..
>
> And, happy to see your test results agrees with mine..
>


Results you could have SHARED in the FIRST place ..

Happy to see my comments on the OpenVPN "Community"
are *not* unfounded.

/me is Bowing out of this subject -- bored of time wasters

regards


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to