Hi, On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:44:45PM -0400, Ryan Whelan wrote: > Is the IPv4 requirement something thats planned to be removed in future > releases? > > I don't assume many people have adopted IPv6 yet.
Ensuring stable, robust and complete IPv6 (+IPv4) support was and is
the primary goal for 2.4
IPv6-only was a non-goal so far, so nobody invested time into it yet -
but of course, eventually nobody wants to bother with IPv4 anymore :-)
Realistically, though, there's more pressing things to work on - like
cipher negotiation (so you can upgrade encryption without having to
roll out new configs to all your clients), actually *releasing* 2.4, etc.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
