Hi, On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:18:45PM -0400, Ryan Whelan wrote: > On May 4, 2016 16:52, "Gert Doering" <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote: > > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:44:45PM -0400, Ryan Whelan wrote: > > > Is the IPv4 requirement something thats planned to be removed in future > > > releases? > > > > > > I don't assume many people have adopted IPv6 yet. > > > > Ensuring stable, robust and complete IPv6 (+IPv4) support was and is > > the primary goal for 2.4 > > Are there still issues with IPv6? Is it premature to start using IPv6 in > production? I didn't know 2.4 had any needed IPv6 changes.
2.3 will not deal nicely with dual-stack servers (read: you can tell it
"use IPv4!" or "use IPv6!" to connect to the server, but it will not try
both automatically - which can cause issues in NAT64 environments).
Further, 2.3 will fall on its face if you connect via IPv6 and push an
IPv6 route that contains the server's IPv6 address (recursive routing).
If you avoid these caveats, it does the right thing.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
