On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Nicholas Petrella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3). are there things that you'd like to see appear ? which direction > would you like the project to take ? > I am looking forward to the work on ruote_web 2. I think integrating the > rest interface into it will be great. I would also like to see a move to > make the engine less integrated with ruote_web as well as the ability to run > it on different web servers. If it is based on rails though, that should > probably already be taken care of.
Hello Nicholas, the engine itself is quite independent from ruote-web[2] and ruote-rest... You can use it as a plain library. Maybe you meant something else. Ruote-rest is based on Rack (http://rack.rubyforge.org/) which provides a convenient platform on top of many [ruby oriented] web servers. Ruote-web2 is Rails based indeed, so all the Rails knowledge applies indeed. Thanks for your support, kind regards, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
