Hey John, I honestly haven't looked much yet at ruote-web 2. I ran into a lot of problems when I tried to use both ruote-rest and ruote-web on top of the same engine. I figured ruote-web2 would be much improved so I am glad to hear that. Once we finalize all the other parts we are putting with the engine (all of our python code), I will give the new version a try both because I am really excited about it and to give you some more QA.
-Nick Petrella On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:05 PM, John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Nicholas Petrella > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 3). are there things that you'd like to see appear ? which direction > > would you like the project to take ? > > I am looking forward to the work on ruote_web 2. I think integrating the > > rest interface into it will be great. I would also like to see a move to > > make the engine less integrated with ruote_web as well as the ability to > run > > it on different web servers. If it is based on rails though, that should > > probably already be taken care of. > > Hello Nicholas, > > the engine itself is quite independent from ruote-web[2] and > ruote-rest... You can use it as a plain library. Maybe you meant > something else. > > Ruote-rest is based on Rack (http://rack.rubyforge.org/) which > provides a convenient platform on top of many [ruby oriented] web > servers. > > Ruote-web2 is Rails based indeed, so all the Rails knowledge applies > indeed. > > > Thanks for your support, kind regards, > > -- > John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
