On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:22:59AM +0000, Hartog C. de Mik wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 07:14:42PM +0900, John Mettraux wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 03:03:40AM -0700, coffeeaddict wrote: > > > > > > First off; since this is my first post, let me introduce: > > > > > > <snip; introduction> > > > > > > Recently I stumbled across ruote as I tried to find a solution for > > > fortifying an order flow system done in Rails. I steered away from > > > ruote as there where too many uncertainties. > > > > welcome here. I'm curious, what kind of uncertainties are you faced > > with (it's very useful info for us).
Many thanks ! > Stability: > - of the available MQ's > - and the ruby components required > > Maturity: > - of amqp, ruote, ruote-amqp and all components related > > Solvability: > - of problems due to lack of documentation I have to protest here, ruote is not lacking documentation. I'm always struggling to bring more documentation on the table and always saying "if a point in the documentation is not clear, please say so". Fact : whatever amount of documentation you write, people will complain (as if you had not written any documentation. > Maintainability: > - of the produced setup (but that is more an work-internal issue) You forgot the point about responsivity of the mailing list ;-) Thanks again ! -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
