On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:58:28PM +0900, John Mettraux wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:39:15PM +0900, John Mettraux wrote: > > > > I have had a look at your ping/pong example. > > > > http://github.com/coffeeaddict/ruote-amqp-ping-pong > > > > Congratulations for all the work ! I feel guilty because most of the work > > was induced by the lack of documentation in ruote[-amqp]. > > > > I have a few small remarks, please note that I completely understand that > > some of those remarks concern misunderstandings induced by lacks in > > documentation (and not lacking documentation) for which, as the project > > leader, I am responsible. > > > > So : > > > > - Storing the data into ruote_worker/ is a bit confusing for me, I was > > expecting to find some ruote worker code related in there. Maybe > > ruote_data/ or ruote_development_data/ ruote_production_data/ is a better > > folder name. > > Oh, I completely forgot this one : > > - It's a bit confusing to have ping/ and pong/ described as workers. In ruote > parlance, a worker is 'working' on executing processes, ping and pong are > participants, more like "consumers". Is your choice of the "worker" word here > induced by some of the ruote-amqp [lacking] documentation ?
No this is not induced by any of the documentation. It is 'worker' as in a 'work-horse'. Mixing this in with the ruote lingo is confusing indeed. I have changed it (be pushing soon) Grtz, Hartog.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
