On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:39:15PM +0900, John Mettraux wrote: > > I have had a look at your ping/pong example. > > http://github.com/coffeeaddict/ruote-amqp-ping-pong > > Congratulations for all the work ! I feel guilty because most of the work was > induced by the lack of documentation in ruote[-amqp]. > > I have a few small remarks, please note that I completely understand that > some of those remarks concern misunderstandings induced by lacks in > documentation (and not lacking documentation) for which, as the project > leader, I am responsible. > > So : > > - Storing the data into ruote_worker/ is a bit confusing for me, I was > expecting to find some ruote worker code related in there. Maybe ruote_data/ > or ruote_development_data/ ruote_production_data/ is a better folder name.
Oh, I completely forgot this one : - It's a bit confusing to have ping/ and pong/ described as workers. In ruote parlance, a worker is 'working' on executing processes, ping and pong are participants, more like "consumers". Is your choice of the "worker" word here induced by some of the ruote-amqp [lacking] documentation ? Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
