On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 07:16:06AM +0100, Mario Camou wrote: > > > > On Nov 15, 2013 11:27 PM, "John Mettraux" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ruote 3.0, if I manage to find the time to build it, will probably not > be a > > > Ruby project, but it should be easily accessible, as a service, from a > Ruby > > > application. > > That's interesting. Care to share your thoughts on why not Ruby, what > language or sort of language you're thinking about and why?
Hello Mario, I went too wide with ruote 2.x, one "adapter" for any sort of storage out there. Ruote 3.0 will [perhaps] focus on FS storage. There'll be a set of "conventional datastructures" manipulated by the tools that'd make up ruote 3.0, whatever the language they're written in. I would stay away from Ruby to avoid any "hey I want to integrate that into my Rails project, where is the sample I can copy/paste?" hassle. I also thought that going for Ruby would allow people helping build the system, but no, it didn't, so I'm free to build it in any language I like. What's important (you Madrid guys know it very well), is that other systems can talk to it. Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://lambda.io/jmettraux -- -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruote" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
