On 16 Nov 2013, at 09:26, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 07:16:06AM +0100, Mario Camou wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 15, 2013 11:27 PM, "John Mettraux" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Ruote 3.0, if I manage to find the time to build it, will probably not >> be a >>>> Ruby project, but it should be easily accessible, as a service, from a >> Ruby >>>> application. >> >> That's interesting. Care to share your thoughts on why not Ruby, what >> language or sort of language you're thinking about and why? > > Hello Mario, > > I went too wide with ruote 2.x, one "adapter" for any sort of storage out > there. Ruote 3.0 will [perhaps] focus on FS storage. There'll be a set of > "conventional datastructures" manipulated by the tools that'd make up ruote > 3.0, whatever the language they're written in. > > I would stay away from Ruby to avoid any "hey I want to integrate that into > my Rails project, where is the sample I can copy/paste?" hassle. > > I also thought that going for Ruby would allow people helping build the > system, but no, it didn't, so I'm free to build it in any language I like. > What's important (you Madrid guys know it very well), is that other systems > can talk to it. I completely agree with you. Elixir perhaps? Or Scala or Go :) I hope you get the time to do this! -- -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruote" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
