On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:43:43 +0200 "Ithamar R. Adema" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:05 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > > Actually this is normal. Order is base-files, then > > target/base-files, then packages. It's doing > > target/base-files/etc/config/fstab that is wrong because > > block-mount is not base-files. It looks like a target-specific > > hack to block-mount is needed, because there is no mechanism for > > target-specific overrides to packages other than base-files. > > Ok, in that case, I cannot picture why there is an fstab included in > block-mount, as it is inherently target specific, and without a way to > override it I can only imagine it causing more pain then it is worth > to have a template installed by default. > > Regards, How is it 'inherently target specific' ? It varies from device to device, but even within a target it differs, so we pick what is most likely to be used (/dev/sdXX). It works for most people, and it's easy enough to change. Extroot or external storage isn't something that belongs as an enabled by default option anyway. This doesn't deal with mounting the rootfs for something that needs it to boot (for that you need USB built into the kernel). Regards, Daniel -- <erno> hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is. GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C http://gnupg.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
