On Jan 18, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Otto Solares Cabrera <so...@guug.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote: >>> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of >>> nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we're finally back on the track. Minimum >>> kernel version is probably still 3.1.1. Successfully tested with kernel >>> 3.1.4 on a WR1043ND. Kernel version in the Makefile still needs to be >>> adjusted manually. Any comments appreciated. Enjoy. >> >> Hi Harmut, do you have something for 3.2? I don't want to duplicate >> efforts :=) > > Personally I feel that skipping 3.2 entirely and going to 3.3 is the > right course, > as that has byte queue limits, a fixed implementation of RED, aRED, > multiple improvements to SFQ that make it scale up much better, and > behave better in the general case, and a new combination of SFQ and > RED that looks very promising. >
I would definitely concur with dave on the 3.3 work, it would be nice, but some would like to start 3.2 and maybe even 3.1 and not be so cutting edge as we both are… My vote… 3.3 it would be nice to catch up > >> -- >> Otto >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > > -- > Dave Täht > SKYPE: davetaht > US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 > FR Tel: 0638645374 > http://www.bufferbloat.net > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
