On 18/01/12 04:24 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hello, > > On 01/18/12 08:47, Dave Taht wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Otto Solares Cabrera<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote: >>>> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent >>>> support of nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we're finally back on the >>>> track. Minimum kernel version is probably still 3.1.1. Successfully >>>> tested with kernel 3.1.4 on a WR1043ND. Kernel version in the >>>> Makefile still needs to be adjusted manually. Any comments >>>> appreciated. Enjoy. >>> >>> Hi Harmut, do you have something for 3.2? I don't want to duplicate >>> efforts :=) >> >> Personally I feel that skipping 3.2 entirely and going to 3.3 is the >> right course, >> as that has byte queue limits, a fixed implementation of RED, aRED, >> multiple improvements to SFQ that make it scale up much better, and >> behave better in the general case, and a new combination of SFQ and >> RED that looks very promising. > > Well sure these are interesting features to pull from an updated kernel > version, but it is not a reason for skipping 3.2 entirely, especially if > we feel like making this the base kernel version for releasing Attitude > Adjustment at some point. > -- > Florian
All of that is cool and all but it would need docs or to enabled by default. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
