2012/1/23 Przemysław Rudy <[email protected]>:
> On 23.01.2012 11:20, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> ...
>> Please split this patch into two patches (update to 3.2 and MMnet1000
>> support). Also when doing a kernel update please refresh the patches
> The MMnet1000 support has been already sent (in 2011).
> This is actually an update to 3.2.1 only.

This patch is not 3.2.1 only, it also includes the MMnet1000 support
patch contents:

> --- target/linux/at91/MMnet1000/config-default  (revision 0)
> +++ target/linux/at91/MMnet1000/config-default  (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,1901 @@
> (...)
> --- target/linux/at91/patches/902-MMnet1000.patch       (revision 0)
> +++ target/linux/at91/patches/902-MMnet1000.patch       (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> (...)
> --- target/linux/at91/Makefile  (revision 29742)
> +++ target/linux/at91/Makefile  (working copy)
> @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
>  BOARDNAME:=Atmel AT91
>  FEATURES:=squashfs jffs2 targz
>  CFLAGS:=-Os -pipe -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -fno-caller-saves
> -SUBTARGETS:=netus tqma9263 flexibity
> +SUBTARGETS:=netus tqma9263 flexibity MMnet1000

etc. pp.

This all belongs into a seperate patch and has nothing to do with
updating at91 to 3.2.1 (which you also do in this patch).

Unless you mean this patch is supposed to update only MMnet1000 to
3.2.1, then this patch clearly doesn't and implicitly updates most
other subtargets to 3.2.1, too. I don't think you will be able to just
have on subtarget on 3.2 and the others on 2.6.38, since the patches
won't apply to both.


Jonas
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to