No hurry, I'm busy too :)
Updating whole at91 would require someone else to test it on particular
platform.
Roughly it looks like only patches/* should be the subject to change, so
shouldn't be much work.
Anyway, I'll back to this in spare time.

BTW, u-boot update would be an option too at least for the proper
handling of ubifs.

Best,
Przemek

On 01/27/2012 02:25 PM, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Sorry for the late response.
> 
> On Jan 23, 2012 4:48 PM, "Przemysław Rudy" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>
>> On 23.01.2012 15:30, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> This all belongs into a seperate patch and has nothing to do with
>>> updating at91 to 3.2.1 (which you also do in this patch).
>> ok, as 'original' MMnet1000 patch is not included in the tree my idea
>> was to do it from scratch to replace the previous/base patch.
>> If I get your point correctly, at first the previous patch should be
>> applied, then the new one should include only updates since then.
> 
> No, updated full patches are fine. The problem is if the patch has changes
> that affect other targets/parts, like your update to 3.2.1.
> 
>>>
>>> Unless you mean this patch is supposed to update only MMnet1000 to
>>> 3.2.1, then this patch clearly doesn't and implicitly updates most
>>> other subtargets to 3.2.1, too. I don't think you will be able to just
>>> have on subtarget on 3.2 and the others on 2.6.38, since the patches
>>> won't apply to both.
>> Yes, it does not seem to be possible without touching other targets.
>> I propose an update to 3.2.1 (incremental from original patch) that will
>> be put on hold on the mail list till other targets are ready. What about:
>> - 1st patch - incremental (from old patch) that covers only kernel+config
>> - 2nd patch - changes to current OpenWrt target allowing the 1st patch
>> to be used (but will break other targets)
>>
>> Is that fine?
> 
> Not quite. You should create two separate patches, one "generic" for
> updating at91 to 3.2 (without breaking other subtargets), and one adding
> MMnet1000 support.
> 
> Whether you let the MMnet1000 support depend on the 3.2 patch being applied
> or the other way round is up to you.
> 
> Putting patches on hold won't work, by the time it should be applied it
> likely doesn't apply anymore. You will need to regularly update and resend
> your patches until they get applied.
> 
> So please resubmit this patch split up into the two mentioned.
> 
> Jonas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to