On 12-04-23 06:51 PM, Michael Markstaller wrote: > > Agreed but lets get realisitic, my objectives (home, office & > customers) are: > 1) security > 2) it works > 3) technically perfect
You forgot: 4) sustainable Do you have children? I suspect you don't. Your lack of forward/future thinking indicates that. It's amazing how one's perspective of the future changes when one starts thinking about the future of their children rather than just their own present day happiness. Likely you don't think we should be exploring alternative energies either, right? I mean why bother? Gasoline is still flowing out of the pumps today right? > v6 only meets #3.. and #4, whereas IPv4 doesn't meet #4. > a) It's a big security risk at first as noone really knows whats going > on with IPv6 (at least on customer/user-side!) It's no more of a security risk that IPv4 is. Both are network protocols that carry traffic to one's front-door so one ought to make sure they have a good door lock. b.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
