On 2012-05-27 3:56 AM, Adam Gensler wrote: > I've spent the last few hours looking into fq_codel. Currently I'm > running a pretty basic hfsc QoS scheme for VoIP and Games. Everything > else goes into the Default queue where I have SFQ enabled. From what I > can see of fq_codel, it is only meant to replace SFQ, not the other > classes I have. Right. I put fq_codel into qos-scripts as a drop-in replacement for SFQ/RED and it works quite well, it vastly improved latency under load.
> In other words, if you need QoS already, fq_codel won't eliminate that > need. But, if you aren't running QoS already, fq_codel has some really > great potential to keep things running smoothly under load, yes? Am I > understanding fq_codel correctly? Correct. - Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
