-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 27.05.2012 14:25, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > I wonder though, how many people are using QoS as a band-aid for > bufferbloat. Anyone using QoS to keep their upstream bandwidth > below their supposed available bandwidth ...
Think your fully right, I guess not many - or too many to fix things that arent present without.. In this context (async lines) "QoS" (as it was) has been just misunderstood as a placebo-pill against headaches without working on the reason.. (I'm working with for ~10yrs and if I'm asked - all current QoS-mechanisms [without/pre codel etc - havent tested that fully yet] are just simply crap in real life) regards, Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/CqDsACgkQaWRHV2kMuAJ2LQCgz2h+gVQInGyfxx/BmL8jrwER SoAAnilEGoR94gMbC/zaugDGoID4U18z =OBpW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
