-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 28.05.2012 02:44, Adam Gensler wrote: > I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. QoS has its place. > Real-time traffic, for things like VoIP, needs special treatment. Sure.
> I'm not sure other QoS schemes would qualify as "crap" in that > respect. It serves a real and important purpose. Well, ok, crap is a wrong and too short wording for what I meant ;) In context of users having only access to their box of an ADSL-link its - lets call it questionable or a hard piece of work - to do any QoS downstream (ingress). Upstream this will work.. It only makes really sense to do this egress on the provider-side, this is no technical failure of existing or new QoS-mechanisms but rather infrastructure/politics/whatever.. Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/D/WQACgkQaWRHV2kMuAKW0wCg+i+ZvmlK0dkpb2UdvUxnsf8F gYsAoLrY5+GyDIOC1QRVNRb/DfmBRxDe =mkIn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
