On 12/15/19 2:27 PM, Daniel Golle wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on >> ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year. >> >> However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is useful there, >> or whether it wouldn't be better to just use "vendor_model.dts" ... >> >> Any thoughts on this or any NAK in general? > > soc_vendor_model should be appropriate here is well. why not?
Yes please clean this up and use the soc_vendor_model model, I think this is the common format in the Linux kernel. Be aware that there is a pull request from Martin pending with some changes to the existing files: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2216 Please also move the dts files into the lantiq subfolder at arch/mips/boot/dts/lantiq/ Hauke
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
