Hi, how would you call the SOC variable in image Makefile then? (the equivalent to ATH_SOC and MTK_SOC...)
Best Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens > Sent: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019 14:49 > To: Daniel Golle <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <[email protected]>; openwrt- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename > > On 12/15/19 2:27 PM, Daniel Golle wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, [email protected] > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like > >> on > ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year. > >> > >> However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is > useful there, or whether it wouldn't be better to just use > "vendor_model.dts" ... > >> > >> Any thoughts on this or any NAK in general? > > > > soc_vendor_model should be appropriate here is well. why not? > > Yes please clean this up and use the soc_vendor_model model, I think this is > the common format in the Linux kernel. > > Be aware that there is a pull request from Martin pending with some changes > to the existing files: > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2216 > > Please also move the dts files into the lantiq subfolder at > arch/mips/boot/dts/lantiq/ > > Hauke
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
